How Much Does It Cost to Earn an MBA Degree

When most people consider getting an MBA degree, one of the first things they want to know is how much it is going to cost. The truth is that the price of an MBA degree can vary. Much of the cost is dependent on the MBA program you choose, the availability of scholarships and other types of financial aid, the amount of income you may miss from not working, the cost of housing, commuting costs, and other school-related fees. Average Cost of an MBA Degree Although the cost of an MBA degree can vary, the average tuition for a two-year MBA program exceeds $60,000. If you attend one of the top business schools in the U.S.,  you can expect to pay as much as $100,000 or more in tuition and fees. Average Cost of an Online MBA Degree The price of an online MBA degree is very similar to that of a campus-based degree. Tuition costs range from $7,000 to more than $120,000. Top business schools are typically on the higher end of the scale, but non-ranked schools can also charge exorbitant fees. Advertised Costs vs. Actual Costs It is important to note that the advertised cost of business school tuition may be lower than the amount you are actually required to pay. If you get scholarships, grants, or other types of financial aid, you may be able to cut your MBA degree tuition in half. Your employer may also be willing to pay for all or at least part of your MBA program costs. You should also be aware that tuition costs do not encompass other fees associated with earning an MBA degree. You will need to pay for books, school supplies (such as a laptop and software), and maybe even boarding expenses. These costs can really add up over two years and could leave you deeper in debt than you expected. How to Get an MBA for Less Many schools offer special aid programs for needy students. You can learn about these programs by visiting school websites and contacting individual aid offices. Getting a scholarship, grant, or fellowship can remove much of the financial pressure that comes along with getting an MBA degree. Other alternatives include sites like GreenNote and employer-sponsored tuition programs. If you cant get someone to help you pay for your MBA degree, you can take out student loans to pay for your higher education. This route can leave you in debt for a number of years, but many students consider the payoff of an MBA well worth the resulting student loan payments.

Themes of Slaughterhouse 5 by Kurt vonnegut and Catch 22...

Themes of Slaughterhouse 5 by Kurt vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller In the books, Slaughter House 5 by Kurt Vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller there are many themes that at first don’t appear to be related but once given a closer look have striking similarities. Both books are about one mans experience through World War II, one being a fighter pilot and another being a soldier. Each man is known as an anti-war hero. They do not agree with the war and do not find it appropriate to fight for it. Neither of the two men was the average â€Å"John Wayne† war hero that fights and dies for his country. This is what makes these two books stand out from other war books. Both of these books also were used during the Vietnam War as†¦show more content†¦Billy is a mild-mannered man who would much rather cruise through life turning the other cheek than having a confrontation. He is a tall lanky, goofy character that when captured behind enemy lines didn’t have a helmet, boots or a weapon. He looked so ridiculous that a German photographer took a picture of him to show the Germans how ill prepared the Americans were for war. When Billy enters the POW camp he is portrayed even more as a fool when instead of being given a normal overcoat like the rest of the prisoners he is given a woman’s fur coat. These are not at all what I would consider a war hero and that is exactly what the authors were trying to do. They were trying to question many things about war. One was to question our assumptions not only to the right to wage war but also the people who fight in the war and the leaders that run the war. The authors writing about the characters in this way also paints us a picture that is not often painted. This picture shows that all soldiers aren’t the rugged, handsome, brave and strong men that we all believe but that many soldiers are people like you and me. Most of them kids, that would just be starting college if it weren’t for war. Many of them scared, helpless, and confused as to why they are fighting and killing. These authors question war and its many aspe cts instead of advertise it. A theme that is a little more hidden in each of these books is what war does to people. In Catch 22Show MoreRelatedA Research Assignment : All Quiet On The Western Front And The Sun Also Rises2803 Words   |  12 PagesAnoki Jacksch 12Eng61 16.05.14: Introduction The authors, E.M. Remarque, Eric Lomax, Kurt Vonnegut, Joseph Heller and Ernest Hemingway, who became famous, wrote excellent novels, because they were in love, have an underlying issue or have experienced issues that they want to share with the world. I choose to investigate the following novels: All Quiet on the Western Front, The Railway Man, Slaughterhouse-5, Catch-22 and The Sun Also Rises, because they all thematically connect to the â€Å"horrors of war†Read MorePostmodernism in Literature5514 Words   |  23 Pagesnot previously deemed fit for literature. A list of postmodern authors often varies; the following are some names of authors often so classified, most of them belonging to the generation born in the interwar period: William Burroughs (1914-1997) Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007), John Barth (b. 1930), Donald Barthelme (1931-1989), E. L. Doctorow (b. 1931), Robert Coover (1932), Jerzy Kosinski (1933-1991) Don DeLillo (b. 1936), Thomas Pynchon (b. 1937), Ishmael Reed (1938), Kathy Acker (1947-1997), Paul Auster

Anne Hutchinson free essay sample

In 1637, women were considered servants of their husbands, and child bearing creatures of many. There were set rules â€Å"enforced by the Puritans† which stated women should only bear as many children as possible, raise them, take care of their husbands, and then remain quiet. They were seen as â€Å"morally feeble creatures†, who could do no more than â€Å"lead men to damnation if [men were to allow them] to form an opinion or express a [belief]. [1] Anne Hutchinson of the Massachusetts Bay Colony challenged the standard ways of women, however, when she was brought forth at the Court at Newton regarding private meetings in her home which involved discussing God and religion. The trial, written as the Document â€Å"The Examination of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson at the Court at Newton† can be viewed as a piece of the emergence of early feminism, and allows readers to acknowledge the place women were given in the Puritan society. Anne Hutchinson, born Anne Marbury in Alford, Lincolnshire, England July, 1591 was born into a family of a very intelligent man, who she grew to admire and look after. Anne was home-schooled, and became very intrigued by religion and theology at a young age. She read her father’s books, and studied religion as much as possible. She grew up to be a very smart, determined, and sophisticated woman. In 1634, Anne, her husband, and her 15 children followed their protestant minister, John Cotton, to the New England Colonies. Anne knew of their soon departure and hoped that she would be able to practice her â€Å"faith in an environment† that favored â€Å"the new ideas of Puritanism† more than England did. She had even higher hopes that the New England colonies would be a place which would allow her to â€Å"worship God as [she] saw fit. † [2] After arriving to the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and living there for a while, Anne realized that there really wasn’t such a thing as real â€Å"religious freedom†. She wished to talk about God and her beliefs as she pleased but because of the way women were viewed, especially â€Å"educated English women†, she had no right to do such thing. She stayed quiet for the majority of the time, but couldn’t hold still for long. She organized a Women’s Club in her home where she discussed the scriptures, and her own opinions while praying throughout the meetings. More and more women began to come to here her speak, and eventually men began showing up. Everyone wanted to come into her home and here what she had to say. John Winthrop, the newly appointed governor, soon found out about Hutchinson’s doings and therefore called her to court. The document â€Å"The Examination of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson at the Court at Newton (1637)† is her exact trial. Like Hester Prynne in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlett Letter, Anne Hutchinson was simply a woman who stood strongly for her beliefs. Her trial, I believe, has been made public for later generations to read and be reminded of the difficult times women throughout history have been through, and also the difficult times of people who suffered under tyrants. The document has been produced in order to show that Hutchinson was an early feminist, meaning that she devoted her time to standing up for the equal rights of men and women. [3] Women like Anne Hutchinson, the character of Hester Prynne, Jane Adams, and Susan B. Anthony have worked diligently to add characteristics associated with male roles to female roles. This document proves that men thought women to be ignorant when it came to political and religious aspects. Men were scared that women would overpower them, and take their roles in society, so by belittling them and not allowing them to do hardly anything at all, they felt secure that they would continue to lead society, but when Anne Hutchinson challenged the ideas of male roles, and challenged the idea of doing what she pleased, when she pleased, chaos broke loose in the largest colony in the Puritan society. The document relates to many of the females stated before in that they, too, stood up for what they belied in, and suffered for future women. The document is a reminder for readers, especially women, to value the freedom that they are presented with, and to not take for granted the liberty that we have in today’s American society. In the beginning of the document, it is clear that Anne’s only crime was gathering people into her home to speak of religion and God. Winthrop says, â€Å"†¦you have maintained a meeting and an assembly in your house that hath been condemned by the general assembly as a thing not tolerable nor comely in the sight of God nor fitting for your sex,† [4] which allows the reader to understand right off the bat that Winthrop is accusing her of unrightfully holding meetings in her home simply because it is â€Å"not fitting for her sex†. During this time period, men and women did not have equal rights. The document rightly justifies this accusation by presenting the reader with two gender differing characters in the very beginning of the document; two characters whom do not have the same rights and freedoms, who do not believe the same thing, and who do not see â€Å"eye to eye†. The document continues with an argument between Winthrop and Hutchinson regarding whether or not she committed a â€Å"crime†. Hutchinson believes that the crimes being accused of her are â€Å"a matter of conscience†, and therefore doesn’t think she has done anything wrong. Winthrop quickly lets her know that â€Å"[her] conscience must [be kept to herself], or it must be kept for [her]. [5] Hutchinson, along with other women of the puritan society are expected to take care of the husband and children which has been provided to her, and keep quiet, but Hutchinson believes that she should be allowed to â€Å"entertain† since she has to â€Å"keep her conscience†. [6] Winthrop’s main argument is that she broke the 5th commandment of the bible, which states that one should â€Å"honor thy father and thy mother†. He claims that by breaking the law of â€Å"God and of the state†, Hutchinson is not honoring her father or mother. Hutchinson is giving countenance, or support, to the people in which entered her home, and therefore she is not obeying the 5th commandment, since she is teaching and speaking on our own terms. The reader is able to see now that Winthrop is adding â€Å"crimes† to her list, rather than simply leaving it at â€Å"maintain[ing] a meeting and an assembly [in her home]. † Winthrop tells Hutchinson that she had â€Å"counseled them†, and by that she has â€Å"dishonored the commonwealth†, dishonored the â€Å"authority† to already preach or teach to the community. Winthrop and Hutchinson argue throughout the remainder of the next few pages about how women should stick to supporting men, and nothing else, because there are already higher authorities (men) who set up meetings, and she is dishonoring these men by setting up her own meetings in her own private home. Winthrop begins succeeding at replacing her truthfulness with false claims, and turns everything against her. He orders her to admit to doing wrong, even though she believes otherwise. Hutchinson stands up for women across her colony by sticking to her beliefs. She is very presumptuous and tells the Governor that he â€Å"may stop her from her wrong doings if he has a rule. † The diction that Hutchinson has chose allows the reader to understand that she is â€Å"set in stone† on her beliefs and no matter what, she will not change her mind. She continues to address the governor is a confident manner by telling him that â€Å"[she] will freely let [him] take [her] away†, and force her to stop, because â€Å"[she is] subject to [his] authority†. Hutchinson is like any other very strong feminist; she stays strong to her word and stands p for her beliefs. She lets the people of the court know that she does not agree with the fact that people, mostly women, should not be allowed to form their own opinions about religion, including â€Å"the antichrist†, and whom she believes him to be, and then discuss this freely among people who wish to listen to her speak. [7] Winthrop, along with several other authorities, accuse Hutchinson of saying things that she did not say, and then lightly listen to the few three people who support her, before asking the court to raise their hands if they believe she is in the wrong. When all but three people raised their hands, they decided to banish her from the colony, and imprison her until she is able to be sent away. At the very end of the document, Winthrop lets Anne Hutchinson know what the decision is, and she continues to fight by stating that â€Å"[she] desires to know wherefore [she is] banished. † [8] Winthrop ends the trial by clearing stating that it doesn’t matter. â€Å"The court knows wherefore and is satisfied. † Winthrop and the court wanted to prove their power, and not let Hutchinson over step them, and so they did by banishing her, and not even taking into consideration her wishes. The message being conveyed by the trial was that men were superior and women did not have a say. Men and the authorities of the church and state could change everything around on the women, and force them not to speak, and force them to change their story, just so they could get their way. This particular document relates to the document of John Winthrop, â€Å"A Model of Christian Charity† in that both documents focus a lot of attention of Winthrop, the governor, and his beliefs and insights on religion and Christianity. Winthrop seems to realize that he holds a lot of power in both texts, and states a lot of the laws and orders of the community. Winthrop, in â€Å"A Model of Christian Charity† discusses the idea of the Great Chain of Being, him of which being high on the chain. He states the conditions of mankind, being that â€Å"some must be rich, some poore, some high and eminent in power and dignitie; others mean and submissive. † [9] This is similar to the ideas presented in the trial of Anne Hutchinson because he places Hutchinson at the bottom of the Great Chain of Being and does not allow her any say so what-so-ever. Also, in both texts, Winthrop does most of the speaking and â€Å"preaching†, which proves his placement on the totem pole. However, Winthrop focuses on â€Å"bonds of brotherly love†, and â€Å"noe man [being] made more honourable than another or more wealthy [than another]† [10] in the text of Christian Charity which seems to go against what future he placed upon Anne Hutchinson. How can one man not be made more honorable than another if some men can’t practice what they choose, and some can. Hutchinson wasn’t able to give her own opinion of her religion in her own home like Americans can do today. Freedom is taken for granted so often, and the texts allow readers to understand that Americans need to understand their freedoms and respect that there is no greater chain of being unless you want there to be, meaning you place your God above yourself. Other documents closely relate the trial of Anne Hutchinson in that they discuss the life of Puritans, or the life in the Massachusetts Bay Colony and the religion based society that they embraced. The Examination of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson at the Court at Newton has sparked much interest for this time period. The document is almost vital in understanding the roles that men and women played in the Puritan society. Many historians believe that Hutchinson was one of the very first feminists because of her strong acts towards her Antinomian beliefs. According to historian Ben Barker-Benfield, â€Å"Anne Hutchinson represented the emergence of dynamic individual consciousness,† not just for women, but for some men as well. [11] During 1637, it was unheard of for a woman to come forth and express her opinion and beliefs and challenge those of a man, or many men, especially regarding religion. Hutchinson changed this idea, however, even though the court did banish her, feeling as if they still held the reign and the strong power, remaining close to the top of the great chain of being. Lyle Koehler, another historian who studies females in the years of the Antinomian turmoil, states that â€Å"That Anne Hutchinson and many other Puritan women should at stressful times rebel, either by explicit statement or by implicit example, against the role they were expected to fulfill in society is readily understandable, since that role, in both old and New England, was extremely limiting. [12] He continues by describing the average English woman as â€Å"weak, submissive, modest and charitable,† â€Å"inferior to her husband,† and expected to â€Å"hold her tongue in church and be careful not ‘to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man†¦ Hutchinson challenged the roles of the average English woman and was therefore â€Å"punished† for her actions. I believe Hutchinson changed the course of history in that she was able to set the standard for future treatment of women, even though women were still not treated equally to men, even in 1918, when they were finally granted the right to vote. She set the way for Antinomian religion and freedom of religion, in general. In today’s American society, any one person can practice any religion as they please, and speak of whatever God they so choose, or hold meetings of whatever kind in their homes as much as they like, whereas in the Puritan society this was forbidden. Hutchinson paved the road that lead to this ability of freedom, even though â€Å"freedom of speech† had been produced long before. Her attitude toward her society and religion are seen by many as â€Å"charismatic,† because of â€Å"her gift of fluent and inspired speech†. 14]We recognize this behavior today as fighting for what you believe in and standing strong against the antagonists.

Mission Impossible, Courage Under Fire, And A Time To Kill Essays

Mission: Impossible, Courage Under Fire, And A Time To Kill The last five years have seen an increase in the stand on violence in movies. As action movies with their big stars are taken to new heights every year, more people seem to argue that the violence is influencing our country's youth. Yet, each year, the amount of viewers also increases. This summer's smash hit Independence Day grossed more money than any other film in history, and it was full of violence. The other summer hits included Mission: Impossible, Courage Under Fire, and A Time to Kill. All of these movies contained violence, and all were highly acclaimed. And all, with the exception of Independence Day, were aimed toward adults who understood the violence and could separate screen violence from real violence. There is nothing wrong with having violence in film. If an adult wants to spend an evening watching Arnold Schwartzenager Save the world, then he should have that right. Film critic Hal Hinson enjoys watching movies. In fact, he fell in love with movies at the same time that he remembers being afraid for the first time. He was watching Frankenstein, and, as he described in his essay In Defense of Violence, it played with his senses in such a way that he instantaneously fell in love with movies. . The danger was fake, but Hinson described that it played with his senses in such a way that he almost instantly fell in love. Hinson feels that most movie lovers were incited by the same hooks as himself. Movies were thrilling, dangerous, and mesmerizing (Hinson 581-2). Hinson says that as a culture, we like violent art. Yet this is not something that is new to today's culture. The ancient Greeks perfected the genre of tragedy with a use of violence. According to Hinson, they believed that while violence in life is destructive, violence in art need not be; that art provides a healthy channel for the natural aggressive forces within us (Hinson 585). Today, the Greek tragedy is not often seen, but there are other shows movies that embody and use violence. Tom and Jerry, The Three Stooges, and popular prime time shows including the highly acclaimed NYPD Blue and ER are all violent. There is a surplus of violent movies in Hollywood. Usually, the years highest moneymakers are violent. Even Oscar winning movies, those movies that are the best of the year, have violence in them. Silence of the Lambs, Unforgiving, and In the Line of Fire are just a few. Even with all this violence on both the small and big screen, Hinson makes a clear statement that real-life violence is the problem, not movie violence. He feels that people fear screen violence because they fear we might become what is depicted on screen. Hinson feels that to enjoy violence, one must be able to distinguish between what is real and what is not (Hinson 587). Another essay, this one entitled Popcorn Violence, illustrates how the type of violence seen in film and television is completely different than real life violence. The author, Roger Rosenblatt, describes how young children can be exposed to screen violence early on in life, yet the type of violence is so fictional that the connection between what is seen on television and what goes on out in the streets is never made. The example Rosenblatt uses to illustrate this point is wrestling. In professional wrestling there are good guys, such as Hulk Hogan and Randy Macho Man Savage, and bad guys, which includes the likes of The Undertaker and Rowdy Piper. Every Saturday morning they go into the ring and fight. Its good versus bad. The show, of course, is humorous, as it is meant to be. The characters are so strange that they are comical. They roam around the ring, yelling and screaming, looking quite ridiculous. They play to the crowd, either making them boo or cheer. Occasionally, for example, if say Hulk Hogan is winning a fight, the bad guy's friends might join in and gang up on Hulk. All of this violence, and the kids love it (Rosenblatt 589). The same occurs in action movies. There is a good guy and a bad guy, but the bad guy usually has lots of friends, and they all gang up on the good guy. Rosenblatt explains that sometimes you root for the good guys, and other times for the bad guys. He says that we root for the

Biography of Julián Castro, 2020 Presidential Candidate

Biography of Julin Castro, 2020 Presidential Candidate Julin Castro is a Democratic politician who has served as city councilman and mayor of San Antonio, Texas. Under President Barack Obama’s administration, he served as U.S. Secretary for Housing and Urban Development. In 2019, he announced his decision to run for president of the United States. Fast Facts: Julin Castro Occupation: Attorney and politicianBorn: September 16, 1974, in San Antonio, TexasParents: Rosie Castro and Jesse GuzmanEducation: Stanford University, Harvard UniversityKey Accomplishments: San Antonio mayor, San Antonio City Council, U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 2020 presidential candidateSpouse: Erica Lira CastroChildren: Cristin Julin Castro and Carina Castro.Famous Quote: â€Å"Texas may be the one place where people actually still have bootstraps, and we expect folks to pull themselves up by them. But we also recognize there are some things we can’t do alone.† Early Years Julin Castro grew up in San Antonio, Texas, with his identical twin brother Joaquà ­n Castro, who is younger than him by just a minute. His parents never married but remained together several years after Castro and his brother were born. The couple took part in the Chicano Movement; Castro’s father, Jesse Guzman, was an activist and math teacher, and his mother, Rosie Castro, was a political activist involved in the political party La Raza Unida. She served as Bexar County chairwoman for the group, helping register people to vote and organizing political campaigns. She eventually launched her own failed bid for the San Antonio City Council in 1971. In an interview, Rosie Castro told the Texas Observer that as Julin and Joaquà ­n grew up, she spent most of her time trying to make enough money to raise them as a single mother. But she remained politically active. Aware of their mother’s sacrifices, both Julin and Joaquà ­n Castro excelled in school. Julin Castro played football, tennis, and basketball at Thomas Jefferson High School, where he graduated in 1992. He and his brother won admission to Stanford University and, later, Harvard Law School, graduating in 1996 and 2000, respectively. Julin Castro has credited affirmative action with helping him get into Stanford, pointing out that his SAT scores were not competitive. Political Career After Julin Castro completed his studies, he and his brother worked for the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer Feld, and later left to start their own firm. Both brothers also pursued political careers, making Rosie Castro’s influence on them evident. Julin Castro won election to the San Antonio City Council in 2001, when he was just 26 years old, making him the youngest councilman to ever serve the city. Later he set his sights on a mayoral campaign, but lost his initial bid. Joaquà ­n Castro won a seat in the Texas House of Representatives in 2003. In 2007, Julin married Erica Lira, an elementary school teacher. The couple had their first child, a daughter named Carina, in 2009. That same year Castro was finally elected San Antonio mayor, serving until 2014, the year his son, Cristin Julin Castro, was born. During his tenure as mayor, Castro gave an inspiring keynote address at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, that earned him comparisons to the speech Barack Obama, then a U.S. senator, had made at the convention eight years earlier. In his keynote, Castro discussed the American dream and the sacrifices his family had made to help him achieve it. â€Å"The American dream is not a sprint, or even a marathon, but a relay,† he said. â€Å"Our families don’t always cross the finish line in the span of one generation. But each generation passes on to the next the fruits of their labor. My grandmother never owned a house. She cleaned other people’s houses so she could afford to rent her own. But she saw her daughter become the first in her family to graduate from college. And my mother fought hard for civil rights so that instead of a mop, I could hold this microphone.† The speech helped draw national attention to Castro that grew when President Obama named him the U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in 2014. The then 39-year-old was the youngest member of Obama’s cabinet. Serving as HUD secretary did not just thrust him into the national spotlight, though, it also landed him in the middle of a controversy. The HUD Controversy During his tenure at HUD, the department sparked concerns about its handling of mortgage loans. Specifically, HUD was accused of selling mortgages to Wall Street banks, causing lawmakers like U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren to call out the agency. Warren criticized HUD for selling off delinquent mortgages without first giving borrowers the opportunity to modify their loan terms. Rather than financial firms, Warren wanted nonprofit organizations to manage these mortgages and help struggling borrowers. Although Castro took the heat for HUD’s management of mortgage loans, the agency’s practices in this area predate his appointment as secretary. A 2015 Bloomberg analysis found that since 2010, HUD had sold 95 percent of such loans to investment firms. That’s four years before Castro came on board. Still, critics of Castro continue to hold him accountable for the problem, some arguing that it should disqualify him from serving as vice president or president. HUD’s stipulations for selling delinquent loans was subsequently changed. Presidential Run Since his keynote address at the 2012 Democratic National Convention, speculation that Castro would one day run for president has followed him. The speculation intensified when Castro’s memoir,  An Unlikely Journey: Waking Up From My American Dream, debuted in 2018. Many politicians write books to personalize themselves to the public and broadcast their political views. On Jan. 12, 2019, in San Antonio, Texas, Castro officially announced his presidential candidacy. During his speech, he provided an overview of the issues that have been important to him throughout his career, including early childhood education, criminal justice reform, universal healthcare, and immigration reform. â€Å"We say no to building a wall and say yes to building community,† Castro said. â€Å"We say no to scapegoating immigrants, and yes to Dreamers, yes to keeping families together, and yes to finally passing comprehensive immigration reform, Castro said to applause. Castro has also been a longtime supporter of LGBT rights and of Black Lives Matter. If Castro wins the Democratic nomination, he would be the first Latino to earn that distinction.   Sources Baugh, Josh.â€Å"From Political Matriarch Rosie Castro, the Sons Also Rise.† San Antonio Express-News, Sept. 30, 2012.Cirilli, Kevin. â€Å"Julian Castros 5 Notable Lines.† Politico.com, Sept. 4, 2012.Cranley, Ellen. â€Å"Heres how Julin Castro came to be a 2020 presidential contender and what might be next.† Business Insider, Jan. 13, 2019.Garcia-Ditta, Alexa. â€Å"The Interview: Rosie Castro.† Texas Observer. Merica, Dan. â€Å"Julin Castro Officially Announces 2020 Presidential Bid.† CNN, Jan. 12, 2019.â€Å"Elizabeth Warren Protests Sales of Distressed Home Loans to Wall Street.† Al-Jazeera America, Sept. 30, 2015.

Integrated Social Media Plan for Rockport Company Research Paper

Integrated Social Media Plan for Rockport Company - Research Paper Example Correspondingly, it can be observed that the business strategies applied by Rockport centrally focuses on promoting adequate innovation and engineered designing to provide ultimate comfort and style to its customers in accordance with the changing trends observable in the global market (Adidas Group, 2012). 2. Defining Social Media Goals for Rockport Setting of goals associated with marketing any product and/or service can be considered as a primary and most essential step for modern organizations in order to build a strong brand establishment in the respective business market. Therefore, the primary goals of the proposed social media for Rockport would focus on: Enhancing or strengthening its brand value Driving renovation strategy for its continuous brand development and Continuous monitoring of its brand presence in any respective business market 3. Crafting Message to the Target Audience The development of an effective social message will certainly play a major role for Rockport to maintain its brand equity within the market. In order to meet these stipulated social media goals, the following messages would enable Rockport to build its strong brand positioning in the leather footwear business industry. We care about your comfort and style Engineered footwear to deliver ultimate comfort and style Setting trends through delivering innovation and style 4. Selecting Social Channels/Tools for Brand Positioning Following are the few major social media tools that are selected to promote the global brand positioning of Rockport. Facebook: In its brand positioning, Rockport uses Facebook to promote its product with the aim to Enhance its one-to-one interaction between the brand marketers and consumers Facilitate better awareness and loyalty among the targeted market segment Emphasize to promote rewarding word of mouth promotional benefits to the brand Twitter: In order to maintain the sustainable position in the shoe designing and manufacturing industry, the promoti on of organizational product through Twitter have also enabled Rockport to Communicate brand and its range of innovative leather footwear Generating brand values Demonstrating brand personality Getting adequate feedback and providing customer service LinkedIn: The incorporation of LinkedIn in the promotional activities of Rockport has enabled to build a strong online business network across the world. It thus facilitates the organization in Building network of vital contacts gaining efficiency in managing global value chains Help recruiting appropriate candidates to venture globally Providing and sharing ideas among the people engaged within the network Google Plus+: Apart from the above mentioned social media already used by the brand, The major advantages can be obtained by Rockport through the integration of Google+ in its promotional activities. This can assist the organization in Communicating products/service to a large volume of users Marketing and promoting products/services Sharing of different ideas Providing business solutions Source: (Bonchi, Castillo, Gionis & Jaimes, 2011) Tumblr: As an effective blogging platform, Tumblr can also provide effective support for Rockport to promote its exceptionally designed footwear products. The primary benefits of Tumblr shall thus include Building interactive social communities across the existing and new business markets of Rockport Improving business network through incorporating range of potential users.

Relatively low number of women in parliaments Essay

Relatively low number of women in parliaments - Essay Example India is the second most heavily populated country in the world and more over the largest democratic country in the world. However, even after 60 years of independence, Indian parliament failed to give the proper representation to the women community in India. India was ruled by only once by a women prime minister: Mrs. Indira Gandhi. The current Indian president and parliament speaker are females. Even then the representation of women in Indian parliament is negligible at present. The cases are not different even in some of the highly developed democratic countries like UK and USA. In UK, only 18% of the total parliamentary seats hold by the women. There are many social, cultural and political reasons for the underrepresentation of women in the parliament. â€Å"The arguments in favour of increasing women’s participation in politics rely on 3 principles: Firstly, on democratic justice, secondly, on resource utilisation and thirdly, on interest representation† (Aggio, 2 001, p.3). Neither the God, nor the nature never ever asked the human to treat the women community in a different manner. In fact the dominant male community using their superior muscle power suppressed the weaker female community needs. It is impossible to the current word to develop properly if we neglect the contributions of the half of our population; the women community. ... Reasons for the underrepresentation of the women in parliament The reasons for the underrepresentation of women in politics can be understood in the case of totalitarian or autocratic countries like China, Saudi Arabia, Myanmar, North Korea or Cuba. However, it is difficult to believe that even in democratic countries, the representation of women in the political decision making bodies or parliament are negligible. â€Å"Democracy cannot afford to be gender blind† (Fogg, 2006, p.24). Democracy ensures equal opportunities to all in principles; however these principles often stay on papers alone. India, one of the largest democracies in world, recently tried to ensure at least 33% of women representation in Parliament. An ordinance was presented in the parliament in order to ensure at least 33% women participation in parliament; however, the stiff resistance from some of the prominent political parties and fundamentalists prevented the Indian parliament form passing such an ordi nance. From the above descriptions, it is clear that one of the major reasons for underrepresentation of women in parliament is the male domination in the society. Even though, in principles, most of us agree the ideas of giving equality to the women; however, when it comes to practice, most of the male community object it. By nature, the male community has a dominant attitude towards the female community. For men, the responsibilities of the females are limited to the boundaries within walls of the home. The above belief has changed slightly in recent times and many of the females started to work in offices and other professional organizations just like men. Many feminists’ movements contributed heavily to bring the women out of the walls of the home. Even then, male